Lately I stomp on people who do not understand diplomacy in supremacy
they do not Understand that NAP is not cooperation , we just say we do nto fight agaisnt each other till further notice
they do not undesrtand what is Mutual Defense Pact and if you deny it / reject it you do not have any agreements in place after you broke MDP agreement
now I could understand that if I am playign against teenagers, but if mature guys are writing nasty reports in newspaper only beacause they have no understandign of dimplomacy it becomes a problem. I am guessign there is more peopel like that. so to the point:
1. can we have 4 types of diplomatic agreements?
NAP - it is seen in diplomacy and side cannot attack each other till it is rejected with lets say 24 h peace time.
ROW- as it is but also with peace time- 24/48 h
MDP- Mutual defense Pact - nothing happens until one of sides is attacked- then autimatically rest of guys declares war on attacker + you get share maps
removing MDP- 3 days
Military Alliance - Share maps all the time, everyone declares war at the same time, 4 days of peace time
in general this could stop mindles backstabbing and people sitting in agreements with no intention to fulfill their part.
OFC if you are on offensive alliances and you automatically join war you can also sue for peace after thata but I am guessign it will not be nicely seen by your alliance leader
2. Would it be possible to have diplomacy for Coalitions?