funny update.i won another special scenario ,an arms race , and this one rewarded me with an equivalent medal of the base map:)))).so that means that the world in flames medal from the colonial uprising win should have been awarded?
and another thing ive noticed,allied scenarios arent counted as allied victories as well
i have seen namaland absorb literally every african province south of the ecuator,in a world in flames
yes,sorry i forgot to update about it
I understand your frustration, you thought at the start such medal existed but it strangely didn't? To my knowledge it does give you a badge for the map it's based on but I might be mistaken.
i wouldnt call it frustration,just a sense of deflation,and yes i tought too that at the least a badge for the map it's based,world in flames in this case, will be rewarded.
Its a shame because these events are most of the time more intense than a regular game
I have just won a gruesome colonial uprising game that took 2-3 hours per day for the last 31 days and altough i think the 50k gm are nice,they are ephemeral,and i cant help but feel a little dissapointed by the fact that i dont see any colonial uprising medal in the achievements section...
a mod is already on it .thanks though.posted this here so they would know that there is a bug
title says it all
I got you that this county mention have natural oil deposits in real life, But if make a map you need consider other Resurses to . And you need iron and that add with Romania instand of oil. Maps are made to make a balance all resurses and not on realistic how it is or how is was.
if htat was true then this imbalance im complaining would have already been balanced out
You need iron to do anythin with your oil. But oil is indeed on that map a very strategical resource.
As of now my 2 soon to be 3 victories came by playing morocco once and east algeria twice.I have greatly benefited from the oil distribution but it also feels like nobody else has a chance if they dont rush you in early game.As an african country the only thing you need is to survive 5-6 days and then conquer spain who has 2 double iron provinces and bam round won...you might as well close the game that very moment because the rest is just time dragging
Fight for oil! kill oil starting Lands, Romania is great starting for Iron indeed can make if play some else 2 perfect land Romania for Iron and Arabia for oil and trade both other need every day. Us Arabia will tons of oil same what Romania will have but with out Oil.
You did not understand not even one thing from what i've said.
There should be a more even distribution of oil throughout the map.Romania, Ukraine,Caucasus and Russia have obnoxious natural oil deposits in real life,that is not reflected on the map.On top of that its hard for the players who did not start in africa to cope with those that did in the endgame becasue of the oil exxagerated discrepancy
You know what? Put a **** retire button somewhere so that the guy who wants out wont be scared about how his military stats will look and then state it clearly in the rules then who so ever does shit like this (basically donating provinces, I'm sure you have your way of figuring it out from the game logs)even if it is by war or by donation will be disqualified/banned.****
it will not change a thing
you just put 1 inf in every town of your friend/ he gives you 1 inf in every town, 5 sec war and his whole country is yours...
and then I am surprised to see players who have no idea how to play but they know how to swarm fighting and dying in millions like lemmings
at least it gives the chance to everyone to see that something is happening and they can swoop in and claim something because this whole 5 second war will take a lot longer taking travel time into consideration.
no, they won't be disqualified. The wolfpacking rule exists to handle the problem that some people are joining together a map only to support an other player to win.
If one player in a later stage of the game decides to surrender this isn't a violation of the rules.
mods should put a cap on province donation as they did with the troops donation,it may not be illegal according to present rules but it should be illegal because of common sense.
Bytro this is how you make people drop this game
this .my god i wasted at least 10k because of it
call it how you want
you need to learn how to fight bigger guys and win
I was sometimes fighting wolfpacks of 10- 15 people and they were not wolfpack because there was no evidence they joined game together
this is how I learned to win and got my military score
sooner you will create strategy for a bigger guys- the better for you
I am the biggest player in that scenario now,which is why it irks me that someone undeserving received enough charity to almost catch up to me.
i also have messages from them admitting the whole thing.can they be disqualified ? that is my question
That's where you're wrong. It's called Unconditional surrender, and he wanted to give others a Chance to win. In this case, the Sides can go both ways.
Are you mental?that is not how this game should be,it is not fair play , unconditional surrender is a surrender in which no guarantees are given to the surrendering party. In modern times, unconditional surrenders most often include guarantees provided by international law. Announcing that only unconditional surrender is acceptable puts psychological pressure on a weaker adversary, but may also prolong hostilities
This doesnt apply to him.He was far far stronger then those 2 beneficiaries.He did not want to have the hassle of conquering his allies and then rage quit.
The term you are looking for is unlawful enrichment on the beneficiaries' side
if you read TOS and Rules you are obliged to follow fair play and not get any unfair advantage
getting provinces, resources and mechanized troops for free while using remaining forces of your friend against common enemy is for sure against any fair play and gives unfair advantage completely not related to gameplay, Gms ,activity or skills. It is all about who have more friends on map. Not saying that using friends to weaken common enemy while taking everything for free from frriends is in my opinion exact description of Wolfpacking , but in supremacy you need to prove that that was intention of the eaten friend to be sacrifice lamb for another friend. And this is hard.
in my book unfair advantage, no matter if it was acknowledged before or after game has started, is still unfair advantage and should be treated as a such. That means - removed from supremacy.
The guy was 111 regions big and donated 60 to regions to an 80 regions guy and the rest to a 30 region player.in addition to that other player that spied him told me that he was donating huge armies and huge amounts of resources in the days prior to this, probably because if he gave them the regions first the resources would have been lost.
He gave up and decided to show me the middle finger one last time
I think there is enough evidence to prove the fair play rules breach
its not called such a foolish thing.i lead a game as of now and the guy who was in 2nd place realized he cant catch me and threw a tantrum and donated all of his possesions to a smaller player that was in his sphere of influence ,basically creating a player almost as powerful as me thorugh no merit of his own .
This screams of collusion and it should be illegal