On a helicopter
Posts by j10211647
-
-
And KFC too
-
I think that the music is fine. Could they have done something else? Yes, they could have, but it does not bother me and I think other players do not mind it at all. Could have been worse, they could have made the soundtrack without a place to deactivate it in the settings.
-
because they were
-
with a great
-
What does that have to do with the conversation
-
Hear our plea
-
Nowhere to turn
-
-
Affect and Effect.
These two words have given me so much trouble when I write. I am a native English speaker and I really cannot tell you which one is which. I believe that affect is to influence and effect is a result of something.
-
Then and Than. Most English speakers write than when they mean then and vice versa.
-
That is a good offer. I think you should take it.
This is my best offer that I got.
+200 for no reason!
-
I would agree with Golden Frieeza on this, but to a lesser extent. I think that the level 5 would be good. It is right now at level 3, so going two levels would stop some of the newer players, while keeping enough players that can play it in. 500 players are a lot, and it can take up to 5 days for it to fill up. So rising it up to level 5 would help stop the newbies from getting in, but keep enough of them to have 500 players in the game.
-
I guess you are new to the game then jaffar386. It would been flagged by the moderators if it was cheating and we would not be able to see or post on it anymore. I for one think that it is a good strategy.
Edited: Removed infringing content.
- Keji Gima
-
I think it is a good idea. However, spies are the only unit that can be dismissed, would that be a problem if it was added to the game?
-
That is great. Thank you for telling me that Arcorian.
By the way, if anyone was wondering the 4 times speed map that I am doing is, it is the "Gold Rush The Great War".
-
I know, and at least have it so that if people on inactive they can rejoin the coalition they were in. For example, in the 4 times speed match I am in, a person can go inactive by not being online for one day, which is 4 days in game. Yet if you return to the game, you cannot get back in a coalition for 3 real days.
Is "leaving a coalition" the same as going inactive? No, it is not.
While we are on the subject of 4 times speed matches, I think it would be nice if players would not be marked as inactive for missing a day.
-
Some may say that this thread does not belong here, but I think that it does. While I was playing a 4 times speed map, I fell inactive, and my coalition fell apart. When I tried to make a new coalition, it said that I have to wait 2 and half more real days. Which, on a 4 times map, it is 10 days in game. Now because all trading can only be done through coalitions, I have allies that need things that I have and they have things that I need, but we cannot trade because we are not in a coalition.
What I would suggest is that, on 4 times speed maps, shorten the time to which you can join or rejoin a coalition. If it could just be shortened to one day, it would be very nice. I am not saying shorten all coalition cool down times, just in the 4 times speed maps.
Players, tell me what you think. Have you been in a 4 times speed map and have the same thing happen to you? -
Supremacy 1914, Supremacy1, Call of War 1942, Conflict of Nations World War 3, and New World Empires. Basically all of Bytro Lab's games. Although, I have not tried Mars Tomorrow.
I also play Rule the Waves 2. It is a game where you are an admiral of a nations navy. I like it because you can create your own ships in it.
That is about it.
-
Well if that is the case, then I think that the people who do not mind paying would probably would like to see something like that happen.
It is a good idea for the players who pay in small amounts and do not like the "big spenders". You would get support from those type of players. I think that it is a good idea if, like you said, it is a separate mode of the game. If it is like that, I have no objections. Good luck.