The opponent has gone radio silent and we're looking for someone else to challenge. PM me about it so we can get something going.
Messaged you on discord
Posts by Montgomery Morris
-
-
Haha no worries. Though the responses in this thread are pretty funny lol
-
Agreed
(although I never join any alliance)Well you should! I sent you an invite! Lmk if you have any questions!
-
I also want to point out that the objective of alliance games is to pit alliances against each other, and if the opposing alliance wants to surrender, then I would consider that a fulfillment of the initial goal. With that in mind, perhaps it calls into question why 1500pts or any arbitrary number, which is only indicative of performance relative to the rest of the map, is used to end alliance games. (Although this is probably a whole other discussion) If domination maps have an unique objective of capturing a number of "flags"/provinces, I don't see why alliance games can't.
To add on to what has been said about preserving K/D, perhaps the surrender is conditional on the winning side's acceptance, which would reflect reality, regardless of moral, ethical or statutory obligations to accept it in real life.
Monty
-
100% agreed. It's like they went out of their way to piss off the community. Even when companies do this, they'll revert when they hear the outrage, so here's hoping Bytro listens and either reinstates this or provide a surrender button.
Monty
-
Aram MMort could be interested, based on your profile, this is your alliance?: https://www.supremacy1914.com/…lliance/:allianceID=59849
We'd have to fiddle with the proposed rules though, 14 days is too long
-
I am a Captain of course
I made another spot, so we're at 38/40, should be no problem joining!
-
Can't join - you guys are full up. Thanks for thinking of me though
Oh what, we have 39 members, there should be room for one more. What level are you? Apparently the member cap fluctuates with member levels but a Sargent fit into that last spot before so as long as you are better than that it should work.
-
Relatively new player looking to join an active alliance that has at least some veteran players of the game. Major plus for me if you are on Discord.
Looking over this ..... this reads like a personals ad!
Anyways .... I am on a lot, enjoy the game, and am eager to learn and play as part of a team.Hey you're in luck! Mercator Mortalis is recruiting! We've got a solid mix of vets and newbies, but the most important thing is the drive to learn more about the game! I am on discord, but we have some members that are of the older crowd and weren't comfortable using it so we usually just talk using the alliance chat and make a discord/skype for individual alliance games. Send an application!
-
Montgomery I will have one of the Boot Brigade officers contact you for this open challenge, do you want us to make map or do you want to do it, we like to have a gentleman's agreement of NO GOLD USE for any alliance Battle map, do you have authority to abide and enforce this gentleman agreement with your clan?
If yes then feel free to contact Boot Brigade Officer Hubbahub he has interest and authority.
Sounds good. I have full authority on this matter. I have an idea of what we want the game rules to be so I will discuss this with Hubbahub.
-
we can use
alliance tournament once a year
and alliance league that runs whole year long. here it would be good idea to have button Walkover to press if you want to save you ELO and give league points to opponent's alliance without wasting time and ELO.
Yeah weren't those things already implemented before? Should be little work taking them back out again.
-
If you are still accepting challenges, Mercator Mortalis would like to challenge you guys.
-
Did you guys end up fighting? Mercator Mortalis is down to have a 5 on 5 against either of you two
-
I heard that after a certain amount of kills in a day, the stats no longer apply, is that true? Does the same apply for deaths? I did a cursory search but nothing came up.
Best,
Monty
-
Hey war-play , is there space for one more? I joined the skype link but it seems to be all Russian
-
Stop you troops. Just stop. Wait a second and order them to attack something in you path, even ifit is a zillion miles away. I have had this as well, this seems to cure it short term.
Ok will give it a go, thanks
-
When choosing to attack a city, it is showing me that the travel time will take 5 days, even though I am already landed and within one cm of screen space away. It's even affecting it so that it automatically reroutes me the long way. The only possible explanation I can think of is that we still have two hours of peace time, but by the time my troops reach the city, this should have expired. Is this a bug?
Best,
Monty
-
Display MoreI find the constant supply of conscripts make it too easy for countries to continually throw troops at their enemies making extremely aggressive players which result in the game ending to quickly. I would love to see for a slower paced game that rewards players for regrouping their armies before starting a new war and artillery being used more.
Also I love the idea of rivers going throughout the Map allowing for some fun naval play although the bridges don't allow for boats to pass underneath them which I find silly. This results in the rivers not being used for navy which I think is silly. In fact I find the navy to be very interesting in the game yet extremely underused as most countries don't need to use navy to get around as basically all the land is connected and rivers can't be used. One suggestion to make navy more useful would be to allow for certain boats to pass underneath bridges so countries can control their rivers easier and stop sea to land attacks better.
My final suggestion would be to allow for the building of military outposts that act as small capitols. These outposts would grant all neighbouring provinces added moral and if taken, negatively effect their neighbouring provinces. I think this system would be better then having to make a crazy amount of propaganda offices while also allowing for players to make more strategic choices for where they attack. Suggests players to target certain provinces rather then storm them all. To balance this out an implementation of these outposts could mean that defenders get a larger bonus then they do now either forcing attackers to bring a larger force which slows down gameplay or bring more artillery or target these outposts.
Thanks so much for reading this out and I hope the developing team can implement some of my ideas as I find it stupid how coalitions can win a full game in under three weeks.
-Watson15
I'd like to see the river access granted. The military outpost could be interesting too, but I think the river access should be a higher priority.
-
Unfortunately Monty, at the moment I can not think of an alternative that would provide the opportunity to track, research and take actions as deemed necessary. I will ponder it though. Redundancy has it's value too.
Alright sounds good, I'll just submit additional reports as new evidence comes to light. Although I'm considering just quitting that server, I'm pretty much crippled so I'm not sure if all this work in the name of justice to bring that guy down is worth it. It's also additional workload for you guys. Thanks for answering our questions though!
-
Monty, see #5 in my reply list. We do keep track.....
Yes I understand that, I just didn't want to inundate the system with additional reports so I was wondering if there was an alternate avenue to provide additional evidence, or is it preferred to submit additional reports as necessary?
