Well now, except Supremacy, I play Supremacy 1....
Posts by LeaderIcarus
-
-
If you are able to play Civ 5 you have more time than I will ever have for playing
No, I am not... |In fact i uninstall Civ.
Supremacy and pubg are the majority of my "playlist", with a 95-5% between them...
-
well.. limited time, but if i can spare a little bit I play
-Pubg
-Civilizatrion V
- Football manager (even though its the most difficult one to play with out spent hours, or days, just to overcome a single hard opponent.)
and i want to start over (all) Never winter nights and (all) Balture's Gate games..
I love thinking and strategy.
-
Well... Yes. This could be handy. Separating the spied countries, could help also. A menu like diplomacy.
-
It's called Unconditional surrender,
In order to call this you have to be on war. Unconditional Surrender is when you surrender to YOUR enemy, not when you give your split your country among your allies!
Unfortunately, though, this (An official has already state this, but i am not taking their place) is not illegal, but the real question is "Is this Ethical?"
I say Yes It is Ethical... It was a desperate move. A sacrifice. War has sacrifices. has Desperate moves, too.
ANS yes! this is a hard situation for the winning party.
It was a sudden move that caught you of guard, and guess what.. That was their intention. You have all the rights to be frustrated but keep it together and try to regroup, so you can say "I won no matter what!"
-
-
Congratulations for the first AND for completing the very first Ranked Game!!
Well done!
-
I think that is very difficult to implement, but the benefits and the gains are countless..
What about coalitions? A better tariff between the members or non at all?
-
Indeed!
-
Update on game 1: getting to the finish line.
1 player is out already
2 players are around with 1 province left and looking for ways to NOT die first. Because the first person to die loses more ranking points
And then there is a 3 player "alliance' who will probably gang up on lonely britain
Well, now!!!!!
This is brilliant!
How about a post for every game that will allow us to know what is going on? Like the newspaper, but for the forum. Coalition creations, war/peace declarations, RoW , game abandon and "terminations"
-
ten of thousand
-
wow MacDouwe!!! How much thousand (!) dollars have you spend for this???
wow...
-
Golden Buddha it works fine... and with fine i mean that cow doens't have airborne untis
-
Oh, come on.. I did read the same thing! I lol 😂 peripheral reading and speed reading is aufull!
-
proudly singing for
-
well, no. No bomber for air transfer.
The units on the sea dont become (or turn) a ship. They just have a anchor icon. Oh, and a dis/embark waiting time, a moral penalty, a defend penalty and a speed penalty
So, the "airborn" units will have just a plane icon, an un/load coolodown period (half an hour is enouph. military transport tend to be more simplified), no attack, no defence except if stacked with planes. and a speed bonus!
a single infantry unit will travel alone, just to transfer it faster on safe ground. airport to airport.
Golden Buddha. 30.000.000 is 30.000 infantry troops in the game, so if you can afford them , i say YES...Go for it!!
-
Thank you, and i wish that this will be the beginning of a new era for the game.
Of course the entry fee is a bit high, as the reward of the map will be way lower than the 5k. I think that the fee will not attract many player into this.
-
Greetings
It is a very interested idea..
-
I am not sure, even if i can't talk on behalf of Bytro, that they test here for other games. After all they revamp supremacy with the "blueprints" (lol) of call of war.
-
we do not have sea transport
Exactly the same. As the sea transport works.
the unit itself would be "airborne".
