Posts by South Paw

I might suggest that any of the open 'discussions' that may be offensive to anyone, written by anyone find a different place to be written.
If there is a problem with this suggestion, please feel free to PM me and we can discuss possible solutions to the issues.

Welcome back. Always nice to see a returning vet.

By George, I think he's got it! Tactfully and tastefully stated Psy. Well done.

I do not disagree that there are game options that can be built into the game features, and I would also like to see some, to include a surrender option button or alliance game VP settings. However, until that day comes, we have what we have and all things considered with the shape of the world in general, it is indeed nice to be able to discuss the things that are within our ability to try and influence. So much is going on out there that we can not.

LOL! Furry......

I name them stuff like that Frank. "Howdy, how are ya?" Wanna make a campfire?" Things of that nature. Makes it fun in the paper when it comes out. Folks smile I suppose.

Personally, I think that naming units is kind of cool. Nothing like wasting a stack of troops with a battleship named "Have a nice day".....

I actually took the liberties months ago to review this law out of simple curiosity.
As I am not a lawyer, nor am I a German statesman, it is not up to me to apply these statutes, and would suspect that it is not yours either to try and do so.
From what I can discern from it though, is that it is in reference to games that have their premise in WWII, where the symbolism used was allowed for accurate representation of the opposing sides.
As this game is a WWI game, no such representation applies and is therefore negated under your assumption.
But then again, I'm no lawyer.....
I will wait for those with far more experience in this matter to review this post should they deem it necessary.

I can hardly criticize a rule or application of policy that is administered fairly and equitably across the board as much as is possible as being 'obtuse'. Rules are just that, and we expect as much from the staff to try and maintain them as we do from the players to work with in them.

The community is dis-satisfied, or a hand full of alliance or high profile players within certain maps?
The The bottom line is, where is the line drawn then as to what maps are closed at request? 500 player? 10 player?
One size does fit all in this application.

Here's the issue folks: Players have used this 'surrender' option by submitting a ticket to close alliance matches in order to preserve the K/D ratios that they may enjoy.
The solution to this is, win the game and stop trying to spare the loss of these ratios.
The policy is in place. It is there for this reason specifically.
Choose your opponents wisely and expect to win or loose, but play the game out.

Good question. Bet they could figure out an equitable penalty though.

Perhaps a GM option only would fit into this business model. X amount of GM for X amount of damage at random within the province, similar to a GM spy attack, but in reverse.

If it is seriously looked into, I would prefer to see it a penalty to destroy your own structures in a razed earth policy. It is then a double loss, both to the recipient once taken, and to the player evacuating it.

As a mobile player myself, I am aware of this and it can indeed be a bit annoying. This issue, along with other suggestions given by other players, is on the list for platform review by the fine folks at Bytro.
Thanks for the input. It helps.

I will consolidate this over the weekend to update these things that we know for mobile. For the suggestions, I will post them in 'missing features'.
Thanks all.

Info sent in private discussion. Hope it helps.

If you take the time to look into it, there is a wealth of information in the forums, to include a beginners build schedule.

The Razed earth policy has, and is still debated. Don't give up hope.

The current mobile version is not in it's final stages by an means, and feedback like this helps for the future developement of improvement to that platform.
Thanks for sharing.