Posts by NarmerTheLion

    This sums it. If you join a map only to support or destroy one player it's wolfpacking. premade alliances are not under wolfpacking. Wether it's unfair to others is a topic for discussion but if all can do it even with your supremacy friends and not rl friends, I wouldn't claim it's unfair. It's a way of enjoying maps with friends.

    Also input more capital farming or wolfpacking or multi-account I know 3 time can put paragraph here to since are missing , all 3 we're old forum and if were interest you have read rules. Know we're in the rules is forbitten external chat? you have nowhere it is. So no paragraph to copy and past it feels bad.

    What demonaire ment was that it should be added to the rules, not that it is in the rules already.

    I would also like to mention that regardless of his duty as moderator Demonaire is allowed to express his opinion.

    Now is it true that using external tools is circumventing a game feature, the spies. SO theoretically it's cheating.

    However, no realistically we can't ban it. Even if we'd ban "external tool use" then our own chat and forum conversations could be used. Or we'd have to ban our own game features? I don't think so as with many things the theory lies apart from the realistic scenario's. COmes with it that there is barely anyway to proof there is an external tool used.

    Regardless of this all, I never used spies to get information from messages tbh. The information I want as military information, whenever I use spies then.

    Lot of players (most of them ?) are now using discord as an alliance plateform or just to discut a game without being catch by blue spy. I think we can say today discussion about supremacy are happening more inside the discord platform than inside the game discussion. Wouldn't that be a solution to link supremacy to discord with a bot app for exemple ? I do know nothing about how it could work so i don't even know if this would be possible. But it would be a really nice feature if you'd do so.

    You'd mean like linking the supremacy chat to a discord chat so that messages written on supremacy show up there and vice versa?

    But hey, I'm just someone who used to play the game everyday for well over a year (maybe longer, I can't remember) so I doubt my opinions will matter all that much. They never were taken into consideration before after all...

    If you had been around for the last 5 years like I was (and willing to see) you would see many occasions where the devs eventually did listen to the communities. The new interface was needed for several reasons, mainly to allow mobile support which should attract new users in, however the feedback of thecommunity is valued and that s also why the revamped mode is being tweaked to implement stuff that need change according to the users

    I will try to find a similar game that i can play and i will try to enlist friends to that game. Supremacy gave me a good taste and now i want more.

    There are few simular browser games to my knowledge (at least not that don't run on the same game Engine, Call of War, New Worlds Empires, Conflict of Nations).

    Regardless of that I do get the rest of your feedback however the new mode isn't finished yet and will be heavily polished,, before you go I'd ask to give the new mode a try onces legacy is terminated to see if the updates and tweaks have made the game more doable for you.

    I'm sure there's no room for dead ducks if that's what this is/was

    Supremacy was/is not really a dead duck. The absolute figures show a slow decline of user base. Supremacy has this loyal base Where many people who expressed their opinion here belong to. The decision was made to be before we'd be a dead duck. Slow decline is still decline. Bytro is trying to revive it before it reaches the point of no return.As a game this old needs its loyal base to attract new users too. Activity makes activity. If you have nice alliance chats, battles, ...you are more likely to stick around then when you end up on a 31player map with only 3 users on. That is also why I keep stating that it takes both worlds to be satisfied in order for this to be a succes. This also means we need the feedback andbytro needs to listen to the feedback. It is a bumpy road ahead but I'm certain we'll make it. But sadly we will not all make it I'm aware some will leave, but hopefully the succesformula will catch on and our user base will grow so that we can have more active games.

    I too have tried out CoW on 3 occasions and each time lasted not more than a few minutes and quickly returned to Supremacy

    Same, The task of the developers is to combine both worlds as stated before. Supremacy the old format doesnot attract new users. Seems young people want all those upgrades. The first thing I said internally when they announced the revamp was "DOn't make it to much as CoW there is a reason Sup players never stuck to CoW". And that should still not be the goal.Supremacy just needs to look shiny and work on mobile to attract new users. Meanwhile the mechanics need to keep being functional and clean to keep the supremacy users around.

    But in bytro's defence it is logical to look at CoW which attracts new users, and then to Sup that is stagnated on new users. And bytro did take a look what the new CoW users used and must have decided that a lot of them played largely mobile. And looking at the youth, I can think that is true younger people use mobile more then laptop except when playing really heavy games, rarely RT

    300+ days

    you can only join games before day 14 so very old games tend to never fill again.

    A succes is indeed mainly capitalistically decided, the main numbers that they are to release publically is revenue. (are posted in bytro's investors departement) But also active user amount CoW does better althought those numbers are not publically posted. And Mobile and Steam attracted more users maybe a small amount actually sticks. but Supremacy in contrary does not attract new users due to it's old look and mobile incompatibility.

    Sorry for hard word, i felt i had to say it honesly. It is not like it need some minor fix. The revamp need HUGE fix to be accepted by your community.

    We are luckily aware of this, (I'm volunteer so not really a representative) The revamp is inspired by the succes of CoW but needs some fixes and also fixes that were non existing for CoW as CoW does have some stuff that are different to Supremacy luckily there are updates rolling out int he comming months to make the new mode fully functional

    If you were banned by a staffmember you should have been given a email. If it was the automated system then it's a different case.

    It is also a case of the french server so you'll need the french SGO. Seems it was the automated system because you logged in from the same IP adress as Ukraine. I do not know who the French SGO is if you can't figure out you might want to contact Ikkeenniem He's cross server. The chance is howere rare that you'll be unbanned.

    So my coalition just won a game and I have a slight complaint....


    I have gotten use to the home page layout thing with this update, but....when you receive a medal, it doesn't pop up when you log into the game!!! I loved getting that surprise upon logging in! Now I have to go to my medals and check to see when I have received a medal by clicking on them - I don't like this.


    Please bring back the feature of the medals/awards/achievements popping up upon log in! please!!!!!

    Correct and on it's way to be implemented to my knowledge

    Size_factors are mentioned in Articles and not arcane at all, but I will address some applications and implications.

    Game Mechanical Index [To be updated with new pictures etc. later]

    Maybe also take a look here they were made by Alexiel somebody that spend a lot of time figuring out the math behind the game. These area also planned to be rewritten into the FAQ probably as independent section if you are planning to write "advanced Guides" I'm also willing to give you a spot under that same section

    Not yet included anywhere but planned to is the thing underneath but it is the same tool me and Alexiel Lucien developed but then hosted on an external site. I am trying to get as much stuff from external sites gathered on this one. If it was this kind of calculations you ment Polakko