In that case, Supremacy 1 is the perfect option for you
It has dynamic unit types, new maps and great new opportunities for RP!
But just remember in 2 years, they will come up with another iteration of it and take those away, so be sure to use your time wisely
Implying it will be alive in 2 years. Or right now for that matter.
As things are going, please stay on topic as this is for game-play feedback for this update. Respectful and constructive criticism are always nice however if it goes off topic or it gets bad enough with toxic feedback the devs might not even look to see the feedback that would help improve the game. If this topic stays toxic then it might be closed and if it continues to other patch notes feedback then the devs might not even ask for feedback.
Looks to me they already don't care about feedback. Who in this god forsaken earth asked for any of these features?
Denouncing of gms usage and those that buy gms is not permitted.
Ah yes, the good ol' anti freedom of speech rule, so that the whales that support Bytro don't feel bad about spending their life savings on these collapsing games.
GM is a pay to win mechanic that ruins the game and serves the sole purpose of giving Bytro income without having to actually work for it, hit me with that ban now if don't mind
Boys just pack it up and leave this god forsaken hellscape known as Bytro games, it's for the good of your own health at this point.
Also, where did they get this idea of for the recent changes implemented in the game?
I checked the Missing Features or even the suggestion thread, and found no user proposing such changes.
Did they do like a survey I am not aware of? What's going on, Bytro?
They take them from their secret"Shit that ruins the game pile"
Display MoreI do not exactly know the solution to the problems posed by the update,or whether they are problems. However,I have a solution for the landswap problem. I have already made a thread about it.
So,my idea is that there should be a 'map editor' of sorts. You would have to have HC,and above a certain rank to be able to make an editted map. Then,you would have to pay about 2500 goldmarks to make such a game.
In the editor,you can edit:
-Which province belongs to which nation
-Province Morale
-Troops in the province (Eg: You could put 10 infantry,1 cav,1 mechanical car,etc in a province)
-How many resources the province produces. 100% is the standard rate,and the lowest rate is 25%. The highest rate is 200%,and once a province has a 175% or higher rate of resource production,it becomes classified as a double resource province)
-Flag of a nation
-Ruler of a nation and his title
-Capital of a nation
-Playable nations/Non Playable nations
What do you guys think of this? Im sure that you wont have a need to landswap,if you can just assign provinces to nations without having to conquer or trade provinces.
Wasn't around at the time, but according to some old members of the rp community who where, a map editor was promised a few years back. We still waitin' lol.
Not like bytro would implement such a good feature though lmao, if people don't get mad it ain't a bytro update I say
Display MoreWe should take a step back and look at the latest patches and see this from a war game stand point. In any war game, be it an old fashioned board-game (Risk, Chess etc) or Supremacy, we are all looking at what are the moves of our opponent.
These are the facts in this "game" we are playing with "the company" (Bytro does not like it's name mentioned in a derogatory sense or tone. This can lead to repercussions...)
1. "The Company" likes it when people buy gold marks. It pays the bills pure and simple. I will not go into gold mark abuse in many of the games but the few (key word) that spend lavishly help them economically.
a. Financial types in the company can easily track each player and divide them into those who buy gold marks and those who don't.
b. A financial decision must have been made by the powers that be to turn Supremacy and other games into a pay to play. They tease players to play for free but in the end the free persons get steam rolled and eventually give up or break out the credit card
2. "The Company" is easily tracking who is complaining and who is not. They can use their computers and report to the powers that be that on any given day they have X amount of players playing in Y games. From this, how many are complaining about an update and how may are complacent about the changes. Point summary - if we are the minority, there will be no changes.
3. If the people that are complaining are also those who spend lavishly, then "the company" will listen as they do not want their gravy train/s to go away.
4. In the meantime, just like the main cell phone manufacturers, they do not want you to buy a cell phone and keep it that way for life. They want you to buy a new one every 2-3 years (read pay to play...) "The company" is going down the same path.
Point Summary - we all wish for the earlier versions of Supremacy, but sadly I feel those days are in the past. We can vote with our feet but we will be replaced by newer players who never knew what the game was like in it's heyday.
Imagine being afraid of repercussions for voicing your opinion on a collapsing game whose developers give no shits about many sectors of the community
It was forgotten in the S1914 release notes.
I can confirm that "Fire at Will" now functions again as before it was changed, so wars are no longer triggered with neutral nations on the default settings.
Cool, now to wait a few months for the new features, or more correctly, the removal of them, to be fixed, so that we can have something else be ruined 
Rip Supremacy my dudes, big rip
i think it's hilarious that they removed trading between neutral countries for the sake of realism, which is ironic to the point of being retarded already, yet kept province trading, because trading a big ass part of your country, now without the ability to be paid in resources, sure is realistic
It doesn't matter anymore lmao, they've shown time and time again that they don't know what they're doing, whether that's the devs fault or the higher ups, I dont give a fuck
Units having their default being aggressive? No one liked it, everyone said to revert, we even had the promise of it being eventually reverted, and jack shit has happened. Units continue to clash at sea and accidental wars keep happening due to this bullshit
Imma go ahead an quit this game, and I advice everyone else to do it too, here's my main reasons for it (not all of themt)
-It's pay 2 win, and it's not even good at that. Goldmark is only tolerated because the game is free and because the dumb fucks who spam it are too bad at the game to actually make a difference. Never spent a dime on this, glad I haven't
-Wanna make constructive criticism to help the game? We banned you for having a bad opinion on us.
-new ui is bad too, but i dont care enough to keep going, im sure voicing my opinion is already enough to be banned so ill see yall somewhere else i guess
Congratulations on finally making roleplay rounds logistically unviable.
If by some miracle you get Detroit, what AI can you hit next? Halifax. Wow you got a fish. Great work. I love playing as South Canada and if NUSA got Halifax, I would nuke their country, I would go to the shop, buy 1000 dollars worth of Goldmarks and just keep hitting that military sabotage button until their capital is destroyed. Then I would repeat that with my entire bank account. I would take out a loan against my house and sell my car to afford more Goldmarks to grind that slimy North USA player into the dust for seizing my Halifax. I would go to the player's house and ask them to move in. Then I would steal their credit card and run up a massive Goldmark charge on it to destroy him. Then I would purposely get us both banned from the game for multi-accounting because I was stealing his internet.
Amazing paragraph, gonna have this written in my tombstone
This is true and bobokil has a point to e.g. if you click a newspaper article it takes you tothe nation who wrote it (for non anons then) But what about France_ and France? it remains hard to keep the confusion away
A solution would perhaps have it search for the word in the name, not matching it perfectly. This issue of preventing copies gets a bit complicated since even the default names share some words, like any duo of "East/West" countries.
I don't see the amount of people who would abuse the system being any bigger than the amount that abuses the currently editable stuff, and those who do end up receiving proper punishment, so I see it as a having a slight bit more hassle, if at all, for a very useful and interesting feature that complements already existing ones.
You don't really need to worry about the stupid names, since you could already do that with leader names n' stuff. Just a matter of report and ban if need be.
I think it's a great idea, though I wonder if perhaps it isn't quite possible because they reference the names of the countries as constants in the code somewhere? If that were the case, I'd suggest making two names, one which would be displayed as the current one is, and another that would serve to identify the country internally. If the current source code isn't a total god forsaken mess, I don't see it being a very hard task.
inyourdomix in-game, InYourHeart on discord, and planning to play as the United Kingdoms of Spain and Portugal
I was doing some utility landswap maps based on the 31 Player Europe Map (which may be released eventually), when I noticed multiple flaws with the map provided in Narmer's post, likely due to game updates that occurred after the creation of the map.
After a bit of work, I have completed a more accurate version. Here it is, full colors and black and white:
Here is the list of changes:
If you find an error let me know.
Hey I have a question regarding the default option, which says:
"Blocks and attacks close by neutral or enemy units, unless they have right of way."
Say I have a neighbor, who I have a verbal non aggression pact with for mutual benefit, represented in-game by a neutral relation between countries. If I for some reason had an artillery sitting in a city close enough to one of his, would it just shoot his armies?
If so, that is a terrible design choice. It would force me to either not keep units in that province, sign a right of way pact (which I might not want due to several reasons), or just fight him. It's even worse if the reason the artillery was there was because it was built in that province.
The Roleplay has started, but we still have open slots!
The game will be ready to start once we have a player for Hibernia.
The Ancient Modern Civilizations Roleplay, or AMCR for short, is a roleplay about ancient civilizations with modern technology.
Want Carthage with giant modern battleships?
We've got them!
Want Macedonians with heavy artillery?
We've got that too!
Want a Roman Legion riding god damn tanks?
We've got it all!
Alternative history has never been more alternative, so why not alternate your current mundane life by entering the roleplay! We welcome anyone and everyone, and will be glad to help guiding you if you lack experience. Various countries, of differing difficulty, relevance and playstyle are open, so don't worry about not having one that suits you!
Want to have history to back your roleplay? Pick one of the civilized countries! Want to have basically no guiding lines? Barbarian are here for you! Want to be part of a smaller dome before going out? A vassal or a British country might be best!
Currently we have the following slots open:
