Are there criteria? Are they followed?
I have now received a message that was removed from the game for pushing account.
Administrators, I am participating in a game on English server with some friends, and I have now received a message that I was removed from the game for account pushing.
Simply put, not even an evaluation or investigation of the matter.
During the course of the match, one of my Taumalipa allies (Luis) was under attack and I deployed troops to defend his territory, I Cuba (Angelo).
Texas from the south at one point in the game (yesterday if I'm not mistaken) questioned what I was doing and if I didn't explain it to him it would be double counting. I didn't bother to answer him because I was aware of my actions.
Today the system comes and gives a ban without at least questioning us, evaluating different IPs or any other intelligent management that can prove that we are not the same person.
How is that? What credibility do you give to the users? Will we have agility in the evaluation of this request? Will Luis and I be rewarded for any delay?
Very bad the current evaluation of the game support, which simply accepts complaints from spoiled players without basic fulfillment of investigation.
How can the system accept a request without going through an analysis?
It is absurd not to conduct investigations or even question us to collect information or even to enable us to defend ourselves.
They simply accept the denunciations as true. It is as simple as that, and this is absurd.
Where is the legal security? Who is the judge? How does he act? Does he favor friends or allies? Does he act without study, without criteria?
Are there basic observation protocols for this kind of demand? Were they followed?
Questions like these remain open, after all, we have done nothing wrong in relation to the rules and with a clear conscience we can face any demand of this type, as long as it is not arbitrary, closed and absolutist, which, besides frustrating us, leaves doubts about the criteria of fairness of the game and margins for negative interpretations such as:
Would the administrator be a prepared person?
If so, why doesn't he communicate with us and just impose penalties on those who received a report? We didn't even know we were denounced, that's what we know after the punishment. How is this absurd? Imagine a society where a neighbor accuses another of theft and this one is arrested without knowing why and even without the right to explain, what would you think of this?
Absurd, of course. Now the question is, why administrators have the power of Absurdity in their hands, using it to target players (clients). Are they favoring some friend or acquaintance? They are acting without criteria is what common sense tells us! Now they are also acting in bad faith? After all, they don't have transparency, an empire of force versus their clients, that they have!
Slowness? Probably yes, after all they are quick to punish, probably slow to assess, which impacts on the losses to all, after all, would the player who denounced us an integral person or would be using the strength of the system (that you know and know that does not evaluate well) to punish opponents who meet on the way.
This grudge is worthy of the weak, who for not being able to reach his opponent directly, seeks to reach him by dirty tricks, and the worst, accompanied by the endorsement of the administration that passes for unworthy to not be clear, transparent and with harmonic purpose, because it does not offer ample defense or contradiction to the customers that it punishes.
Bad analysis of the administrators of the game, who act in order to harm the same instead of fulfilling its role to harmonize it.
The game to which I refer is on English server:
#4259637 currently on day 08.
